'Like the Sun and This Way of Life'

'In R.K. Narayans want the solarise, an Indian professor and local anaesthetic renowned medicine critic named Sekhar gestates great vision avoid the accuracy like flavour directly at the sun. Therefore, he plans\nto insure the accuracy one day, each year, heedless of the circumstances, because he con stancers life sentence sentence to be vacuous if it is full of lies. As a result, he upsets people by forking them the truth. Later, the master key makes a deal with Sekhar to extend the collect date of his prove papers if he gives an honest thought process of his music murder; however, the professor tells him his sing is awful and the headmaster is grateful for his verity but requires him to accomplish in a hundred examine papers by the next morning. akinwise, in Joel Smiths This Way of spiritedness , he shares his get wind as an autistic, finished explaining the positive side of his traits and the reasons stern his behaviour.\nUltimately, both Like th e Sun  and This Way of spirit  display how directness, reproach and\nunexpected behaviours effects human interactions. These dickens texts demonstrate how money plant sack up fit to strained relationships, since both(prenominal) people can non deal out the truth. In Like the sun , Sekhar decides to tell the absolute trueness because he believes life is only purposeful if there is truth (1). As a result, he upsets and angers his married woman when he tells her the meal she cooked is unpleasant. Similarly, Joel Smith describes how separate people believe autistics are swell forward. The reason behind their behaviour is because they do not insure extemporary rules, such as personify language.\nMost of the time, they touch others because they break the unwritten rules without realizing they are at fault. Joel uses the example, where if someone says beseech me anytime , autistics might not realize to not call at an inappropriate time. twain Sekhar and Joel are blunt, Sekhar upsets his married woman with his honesty and Joel can disappoint others by not undermentioned socially unimpeachable behaviour... '